<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Lloyd about life</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lloydaboutlife.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lloydaboutlife.com</link>
	<description>Some thoughts from everyday news and personal events</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 09:46:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A bit about Geraint by mars</title>
		<link>http://lloydaboutlife.com/about/#comment-2853</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mars]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 09:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2853</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hi lloyd! your blog is such that inspires me to do blogging too about my Christian walk. I recently bumped into yours in an attempt to motivate myself to share my everyday contemplations-which I&#039;ve always wanted to-  but frankly,I do have issues with privacy. haha..Well I just wanted to be that geeky, creepy incognito behind the screen doing online Journals.. lol, thinking about it, oddly enough, i do find it very juvenile considering that that was just prolly a year ago. 

Anyway, I just dropped by to say how much i find it really amazing to be reading anecdotes from (in your case) 6 years ago. I was just about 12 when you statrted blogging,(or prolly not, I saw an entry about the moving to wordpress thingy). Point is, I was far behind from where I am today and the mindset and experiences that Ive acquired through the years, I dont know.. maybe I was still playing Jack stone or something by the time. Yet in those fragile years, God had prepared the pathway for me to walk in, the people, the schooling, and what do you know, the reading materials.. To state it bluntly, your blog isnt much of a difference from the other blogs tht Ive encountered.. Some were more interesting,actually. But I dont know..there&#039;s something about your blog, that convinces me It&#039;s not by chance that I came across it. :) God bless you :))]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi lloyd! your blog is such that inspires me to do blogging too about my Christian walk. I recently bumped into yours in an attempt to motivate myself to share my everyday contemplations-which I&#8217;ve always wanted to-  but frankly,I do have issues with privacy. haha..Well I just wanted to be that geeky, creepy incognito behind the screen doing online Journals.. lol, thinking about it, oddly enough, i do find it very juvenile considering that that was just prolly a year ago. </p>
<p>Anyway, I just dropped by to say how much i find it really amazing to be reading anecdotes from (in your case) 6 years ago. I was just about 12 when you statrted blogging,(or prolly not, I saw an entry about the moving to wordpress thingy). Point is, I was far behind from where I am today and the mindset and experiences that Ive acquired through the years, I dont know.. maybe I was still playing Jack stone or something by the time. Yet in those fragile years, God had prepared the pathway for me to walk in, the people, the schooling, and what do you know, the reading materials.. To state it bluntly, your blog isnt much of a difference from the other blogs tht Ive encountered.. Some were more interesting,actually. But I dont know..there&#8217;s something about your blog, that convinces me It&#8217;s not by chance that I came across it. <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  God bless you <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Does science prove, or disprove, Christianity? by Rob</title>
		<link>http://lloydaboutlife.com/science-and-christianity/does-science-prove-or-disprove-christianity/#comment-2819</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 17:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lloydaboutlife.wordpress.com/?page_id=61#comment-2819</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Matt, there is a very concise treatise that you will likely find illuminating, and it won&#039;t take you forever to read: http://www.boomersvilleusa.com/2010/12/is-god-dead-part-2.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt, there is a very concise treatise that you will likely find illuminating, and it won&#8217;t take you forever to read: <a href="http://www.boomersvilleusa.com/2010/12/is-god-dead-part-2.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.boomersvilleusa.com/2010/12/is-god-dead-part-2.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Does science prove, or disprove, Christianity? by Matt</title>
		<link>http://lloydaboutlife.com/science-and-christianity/does-science-prove-or-disprove-christianity/#comment-883</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 11:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lloydaboutlife.wordpress.com/?page_id=61#comment-883</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I find that it is completely too convenient for those advocates of the Christian faith to embrace the approach of free interpretation and spinning the literal meaning of certain points in the Bible to compensate for scientific evidence that discredits the existence and legitimacy of the Christian religion and belief. As science along with many other academic disciplines either intentionally or not, continue to provide evidence and support that discredits the Christian faith; specifically speaking evidence and support that shows contradiction and flaws of the Bible, so will the reputation and genuineness of the religion as a whole suffer. We will come to the point and have probably come to that point where the literal interpretation of the Bible is overlooked and everything goes out the window in terms what Christians believe in when it comes to these challenged theories of creationism and the very sensitive topic of homosexuality and such.

It will come to the point where faith will be the single and only factor that keeps Christianity and all religions alike afloat and sustained. Personally I really don&#039;t buy into this idea of faith because believing in something so abstract in this sense goes against logic and seems as if it really is a long shot for this omnipotent, all knowing, and almighty higher being to exist. I think the one piece of evidence that is the poison to each and every religion is the existence of so many practicing religions that claim to have the one true God and the one true faith. Looking back in history, most of the most deadliest and devastating wars were on the basis of faith and religion. In regards to the argument of &quot;well what do you have to lose?&quot;, I find to be a very weak argument to believe in God, because to dedicate yourself and to believe whole-heartedly in something solely on the basis of faith, even when it defies and neglects every aspect of the human mind on the grounds of logic, is not only incomprehensible, it simply is putting human evolution in the wrong direction. 

Although Science may be a long way from establishing a complete and sound theory as to the existence of humans and the creation of the universe, at least I can honestly say that I would rather be not sure of how everything came to be, rather then bent on the belief and commit my life to this belief of this higher being we call God, who will judge and direct you to either Heaven or Hell when you die. As I don&#039;t mean to judge those who are faithful to teachings of Christianity or any other religion, I respectfully disagree with the assumption that Science and Religion are on the same wavelength. Although contemporary Christians nowadays will try to embrace different interpretations of the Bible to support newer scientific evidence that may discredit the Bible, most religions in the world have taken a very conservative and traditional approach when it comes to their faith and this is naturally contradicting of Science.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find that it is completely too convenient for those advocates of the Christian faith to embrace the approach of free interpretation and spinning the literal meaning of certain points in the Bible to compensate for scientific evidence that discredits the existence and legitimacy of the Christian religion and belief. As science along with many other academic disciplines either intentionally or not, continue to provide evidence and support that discredits the Christian faith; specifically speaking evidence and support that shows contradiction and flaws of the Bible, so will the reputation and genuineness of the religion as a whole suffer. We will come to the point and have probably come to that point where the literal interpretation of the Bible is overlooked and everything goes out the window in terms what Christians believe in when it comes to these challenged theories of creationism and the very sensitive topic of homosexuality and such.</p>
<p>It will come to the point where faith will be the single and only factor that keeps Christianity and all religions alike afloat and sustained. Personally I really don&#8217;t buy into this idea of faith because believing in something so abstract in this sense goes against logic and seems as if it really is a long shot for this omnipotent, all knowing, and almighty higher being to exist. I think the one piece of evidence that is the poison to each and every religion is the existence of so many practicing religions that claim to have the one true God and the one true faith. Looking back in history, most of the most deadliest and devastating wars were on the basis of faith and religion. In regards to the argument of &#8220;well what do you have to lose?&#8221;, I find to be a very weak argument to believe in God, because to dedicate yourself and to believe whole-heartedly in something solely on the basis of faith, even when it defies and neglects every aspect of the human mind on the grounds of logic, is not only incomprehensible, it simply is putting human evolution in the wrong direction. </p>
<p>Although Science may be a long way from establishing a complete and sound theory as to the existence of humans and the creation of the universe, at least I can honestly say that I would rather be not sure of how everything came to be, rather then bent on the belief and commit my life to this belief of this higher being we call God, who will judge and direct you to either Heaven or Hell when you die. As I don&#8217;t mean to judge those who are faithful to teachings of Christianity or any other religion, I respectfully disagree with the assumption that Science and Religion are on the same wavelength. Although contemporary Christians nowadays will try to embrace different interpretations of the Bible to support newer scientific evidence that may discredit the Bible, most religions in the world have taken a very conservative and traditional approach when it comes to their faith and this is naturally contradicting of Science.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Spiders by Ceri</title>
		<link>http://lloydaboutlife.com/2010/01/12/spiders/#comment-866</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ceri]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 22:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lloydaboutlife.com/?p=101#comment-866</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for sharing these insights ... it is good to be reminded to look for such brilliantly designed beauty shining through the brokenness of creation, even the little things we consider pests!

Looking at the stars, I too can&#039;t help but sense that bigger picture. Part of the Bible came to my mind as I was reading your post ... Psalm 19 where it says:

The heavens declare the glory of God; the skies proclaim the work of his hands. Day after day they pour forth speech; night after night they display knowledge.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing these insights &#8230; it is good to be reminded to look for such brilliantly designed beauty shining through the brokenness of creation, even the little things we consider pests!</p>
<p>Looking at the stars, I too can&#8217;t help but sense that bigger picture. Part of the Bible came to my mind as I was reading your post &#8230; Psalm 19 where it says:</p>
<p>The heavens declare the glory of God; the skies proclaim the work of his hands. Day after day they pour forth speech; night after night they display knowledge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dawkins and Delusion by Neil Wyrick</title>
		<link>http://lloydaboutlife.com/2009/02/11/dawkins-and-delusion/#comment-820</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neil Wyrick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lloydaboutlife.com/?p=98#comment-820</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have always believed that I can never quite understand another persons point of view until I try to walk in their shoes and aim in their direction for awhile.  It is what struck me about your opening comment and follow through.

Good job.

Neil W]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have always believed that I can never quite understand another persons point of view until I try to walk in their shoes and aim in their direction for awhile.  It is what struck me about your opening comment and follow through.</p>
<p>Good job.</p>
<p>Neil W</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dawkins and Delusion by M.A.C.</title>
		<link>http://lloydaboutlife.com/2009/02/11/dawkins-and-delusion/#comment-819</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[M.A.C.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 17:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lloydaboutlife.com/?p=98#comment-819</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I guess guys like Richard Dawkins are fueled beside the fact that Christianity itself is divided. &quot;Denominational Divergence&quot; has assured that fact and has left much room for reproach...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess guys like Richard Dawkins are fueled beside the fact that Christianity itself is divided. &#8220;Denominational Divergence&#8221; has assured that fact and has left much room for reproach&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Does science prove, or disprove, Christianity? by Drew</title>
		<link>http://lloydaboutlife.com/science-and-christianity/does-science-prove-or-disprove-christianity/#comment-663</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Drew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 04:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lloydaboutlife.wordpress.com/?page_id=61#comment-663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The bible especially creation tends to follow the theory of evolution in my reasoning tho i agree the bible and neither does science offer the answer for everything.

The bible says light earth and water came before plants, animals, and humans in that order. Science to most says this exact same process in the same order of the bible. The bible and evolution follow together here tho if you dissagree point it out. The fact of human creation is interesting. If you believe god set the laws and motions of this universe into place then he would have known humans would result and thus there is your creation story. Is this right? I dont know but it is a possibility and would help bring science and the bible closer together.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bible especially creation tends to follow the theory of evolution in my reasoning tho i agree the bible and neither does science offer the answer for everything.</p>
<p>The bible says light earth and water came before plants, animals, and humans in that order. Science to most says this exact same process in the same order of the bible. The bible and evolution follow together here tho if you dissagree point it out. The fact of human creation is interesting. If you believe god set the laws and motions of this universe into place then he would have known humans would result and thus there is your creation story. Is this right? I dont know but it is a possibility and would help bring science and the bible closer together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dawkins and Delusion by Peter Doyle</title>
		<link>http://lloydaboutlife.com/2009/02/11/dawkins-and-delusion/#comment-660</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Doyle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 08:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lloydaboutlife.com/?p=98#comment-660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[G&#039;day Geraint!

&lt;a href=&quot;http://peterdoyle.net/richard-dawkins_review-of-the-god-delusion.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; &quot;Never in the fields of science or history have so many facts owed so much to so few – and to an author’s vivid imagination. 

Richard Dawkins is an interesting character. It’s extremely hard to understand how his (by his own convoluted admission) essentially meaningless belief system can generate such a tremendous amount of personal purpose and meaning, devoted entirely to convincing every single last one of us that essentially there is no purpose or meaning. Or at least not in their traditional, readily comprehensible forms – meaningless meaning will surely remain an elusive notion to most of us...&quot; &lt;/a&gt; 

&lt;a href=&quot;http://peterdoyle.net/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; peterdoyle.net&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>G&#8217;day Geraint!</p>
<p><a href="http://peterdoyle.net/richard-dawkins_review-of-the-god-delusion.html" rel="nofollow"> &#8220;Never in the fields of science or history have so many facts owed so much to so few – and to an author’s vivid imagination. </p>
<p>Richard Dawkins is an interesting character. It’s extremely hard to understand how his (by his own convoluted admission) essentially meaningless belief system can generate such a tremendous amount of personal purpose and meaning, devoted entirely to convincing every single last one of us that essentially there is no purpose or meaning. Or at least not in their traditional, readily comprehensible forms – meaningless meaning will surely remain an elusive notion to most of us&#8230;&#8221; </a> </p>
<p><a href="http://peterdoyle.net/" rel="nofollow"> peterdoyle.net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Does science prove, or disprove, Christianity? by Geraint</title>
		<link>http://lloydaboutlife.com/science-and-christianity/does-science-prove-or-disprove-christianity/#comment-658</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Geraint]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 23:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lloydaboutlife.wordpress.com/?page_id=61#comment-658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for your comments Ken. Sorry it has taken me a long time to respond. When I ask does science disprove Christianity, I mean more than just a belief in a God, or even just the God of Christians. Although the existence of God, his character etc are central to Christian belief, I wanted to be more general and ask does science have anything to say about Christian belief as a whole. I accept the point that my question is a bit ambiguous however.
Regarding amputees. I don&#039;t know if God has healed any amputees or not, to be honest. This question is, I&#039;ve discovered, a bit of a philosophical chestnut in the &#039;Does God exist&#039; debate. I feel it has less to do with a specific unanswered group - I don&#039;t think either of us is in the position to say categorically that amputees have or haven&#039;t been healed - than a belief that if God really exists he should show it through some miracle(s) where there has been no doubt that a miracle has occurred. God has done this already when Jesus (and others!) rose from the dead. I intend to look at the question in more detail in a later post though.
Ultimately, however, the question shows a lack of understanding of prayer - not that I&#039;m saying I do undestand it fully. God isn&#039;t a spiritual Santa Claus to whom we ask things and he gives them in a formulaic way. He does answer prayer - I&#039;ve experienced it! - and he does heal people in miraculous ays, for he is lovng and compassionate. But there aren&#039;t any promises in the Bible that if we ask for a specific illness to be healed it will be. The verses you quote are somewhat out of context and misrepresented. I&#039;m not sure that a comment reply is the place for a Bible study on prayer but I can discuss this further if you want.
God has also provided us with the ability to understand our bodies, to learn how to heal them, so medical advancements are also a way that God has provided to heal many many people, including helping amputees for example with prosthetic limbs. It is no less a sign of God&#039;s goodness if he heals in a less miraculous way.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comments Ken. Sorry it has taken me a long time to respond. When I ask does science disprove Christianity, I mean more than just a belief in a God, or even just the God of Christians. Although the existence of God, his character etc are central to Christian belief, I wanted to be more general and ask does science have anything to say about Christian belief as a whole. I accept the point that my question is a bit ambiguous however.<br />
Regarding amputees. I don&#8217;t know if God has healed any amputees or not, to be honest. This question is, I&#8217;ve discovered, a bit of a philosophical chestnut in the &#8216;Does God exist&#8217; debate. I feel it has less to do with a specific unanswered group &#8211; I don&#8217;t think either of us is in the position to say categorically that amputees have or haven&#8217;t been healed &#8211; than a belief that if God really exists he should show it through some miracle(s) where there has been no doubt that a miracle has occurred. God has done this already when Jesus (and others!) rose from the dead. I intend to look at the question in more detail in a later post though.<br />
Ultimately, however, the question shows a lack of understanding of prayer &#8211; not that I&#8217;m saying I do undestand it fully. God isn&#8217;t a spiritual Santa Claus to whom we ask things and he gives them in a formulaic way. He does answer prayer &#8211; I&#8217;ve experienced it! &#8211; and he does heal people in miraculous ays, for he is lovng and compassionate. But there aren&#8217;t any promises in the Bible that if we ask for a specific illness to be healed it will be. The verses you quote are somewhat out of context and misrepresented. I&#8217;m not sure that a comment reply is the place for a Bible study on prayer but I can discuss this further if you want.<br />
God has also provided us with the ability to understand our bodies, to learn how to heal them, so medical advancements are also a way that God has provided to heal many many people, including helping amputees for example with prosthetic limbs. It is no less a sign of God&#8217;s goodness if he heals in a less miraculous way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Does science prove, or disprove, Christianity? by Ken Lyneham</title>
		<link>http://lloydaboutlife.com/science-and-christianity/does-science-prove-or-disprove-christianity/#comment-618</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ken Lyneham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 23:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lloydaboutlife.wordpress.com/?page_id=61#comment-618</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why would science need to prove or disprove Christianity? It needs no proof, it exists ,by virtue of the fact that the world is full of practicing Christians.
You ask this (strange) question, then proceed to answer a different one, about proof for the existence of God. As no definition of God has not been given, then no proof one way or the other,  can not be given. 
If one asked,&quot; Can The God of Christians be proven?&quot; that&#039;s a different matter. The God of Christians IS defined in the Bible. As far as I am concerned, because I strive to be a non-discriminate person, I prefer not to believe in this particular God. For the Christian God discriminates. Many people have read, I&#039;m sure, of the many miracles in the Bible, either performed by God or Jesus, (one in the same?). Also,because Jesus was reported to have said on many occasions, &quot;ask and you shall receive&quot;, &quot;pray and God will answer you prayers&quot;, and as a result millions of prayers have been reported to have been answered. 
To name a few; blindness, inability to speak or hear, lameness, leprosy, death and in modern days, lost items, diseases like cancer etc.
 The problem for me is that I will not accept the teachings of a God who is blatantly discriminatory. 
  How, I hear you ask, does God discriminate? Well He NEVER answers the prayers of amputees. I defy anyone to show me an example of where God has answered the prayers of a person praying for the return of their leg or arm. 
  It seems very unfair to me that thousands or perhaps millions of people have been cured of their ills, and many ills are very repetitive, when not one amputee has ever had their prayers answered. 
  Are their prayers any less fervent than the others? I don&#039;t think so. I&#039;m quite sure that a Christian amputee loves God just as much as a cancer sufferer, a blind or deaf person or a diseased one does. Yet they may pray as much as they want or have the whole world praying on their behalf, and nothing has or will happen.
  WHY?  Because God discriminates against amputees. Therefore I prefer NOT to believe.

KEN LYNEHAM]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would science need to prove or disprove Christianity? It needs no proof, it exists ,by virtue of the fact that the world is full of practicing Christians.<br />
You ask this (strange) question, then proceed to answer a different one, about proof for the existence of God. As no definition of God has not been given, then no proof one way or the other,  can not be given.<br />
If one asked,&#8221; Can The God of Christians be proven?&#8221; that&#8217;s a different matter. The God of Christians IS defined in the Bible. As far as I am concerned, because I strive to be a non-discriminate person, I prefer not to believe in this particular God. For the Christian God discriminates. Many people have read, I&#8217;m sure, of the many miracles in the Bible, either performed by God or Jesus, (one in the same?). Also,because Jesus was reported to have said on many occasions, &#8220;ask and you shall receive&#8221;, &#8220;pray and God will answer you prayers&#8221;, and as a result millions of prayers have been reported to have been answered.<br />
To name a few; blindness, inability to speak or hear, lameness, leprosy, death and in modern days, lost items, diseases like cancer etc.<br />
 The problem for me is that I will not accept the teachings of a God who is blatantly discriminatory.<br />
  How, I hear you ask, does God discriminate? Well He NEVER answers the prayers of amputees. I defy anyone to show me an example of where God has answered the prayers of a person praying for the return of their leg or arm.<br />
  It seems very unfair to me that thousands or perhaps millions of people have been cured of their ills, and many ills are very repetitive, when not one amputee has ever had their prayers answered.<br />
  Are their prayers any less fervent than the others? I don&#8217;t think so. I&#8217;m quite sure that a Christian amputee loves God just as much as a cancer sufferer, a blind or deaf person or a diseased one does. Yet they may pray as much as they want or have the whole world praying on their behalf, and nothing has or will happen.<br />
  WHY?  Because God discriminates against amputees. Therefore I prefer NOT to believe.</p>
<p>KEN LYNEHAM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

